Source papers
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 28 participants Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: 15 min / Twice daily / 8 weeks Area: One side of the face Device: Portable red light-emitting device Source Na JI, Suh DH. Dermatologic Surgery. 2007.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 13 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Acne-affected skin Device: Red light therapy devices; some acne literature overlaps with photodynamic therapy Source Wu Y, Deng Y, Huang P, et al. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2021.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Age-related macular degeneration
Study facts systematic-review 2 included studies Evidence: low; direction: unclear Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Ophthalmology-device specific / Ophthalmology-device specific Area: Eyes/retina Device: Specialized ophthalmic PBM systems Source Henein C, Steel DH. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021.
Evidence: low Direction: unclear Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Age-related macular degeneration
Study facts meta-analysis 3 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Ophthalmology-device specific / Ophthalmology-device specific Area: Eyes/retina via ophthalmic PBM systems Device: Specialized ophthalmic photobiomodulation devices Source Rassi TNO, Barbosa LM, Pereira S, et al. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous. 2024.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Hair growth / androgenetic alopecia
Study facts meta-analysis 8 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 650 nm Dose/timing: Varied; lower-frequency treatment subgroup performed better than high-frequency treatment subgroup / Short and long courses were both represented Area: Scalp Device: Low-level laser comb and helmet devices Source Liu KH, Liu D, Chen YT, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2019.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Soft-tissue injury / ankle sprain
Study facts meta-analysis 6 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across ankle sprain studies / Varied across ankle sprain studies Area: Acute ankle sprain region Device: PBM devices for musculoskeletal injury Source Alayat MSM, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2024.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 6 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: 630, 670, 414, 445 nm Dose/timing: Varied across at-home LED studies / 2 days to 12 weeks across included studies Area: Acne-affected facial skin Device: At-home or portable red and/or blue LED acne devices Source Ershadi A, Barbieri JS. JAMA Dermatology. 2025.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Bell's palsy / facial palsy
Study facts meta-analysis 12 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Clinical facial palsy protocol-specific / Varied by trial Area: Facial nerve/muscle targets Device: Laser therapy / photobiomodulation Source Lin HW, Chen HC, Lin LF, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2024.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Breast cancer-related lymphedema
Study facts meta-analysis 9 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Clinical lymphedema protocol-specific / Varied by study Area: Upper limb/axillary lymphedema targets Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Smoot B, Chiavola-Larson L, Lee J, et al. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2015.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Breast cancer-related lymphedema
Study facts meta-analysis Study count not extracted Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: 2 J/cm2 / Three times per week in the favored subgroup / More than 15 sessions favored some outcomes Area: Axilla or lymphedema-related upper limb targets Device: Low-level laser / photobiomodulation Source Chiu ST, Lai UH, Huang YC, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2023.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 8 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Wrist/carpal tunnel region Device: Low-level laser therapy with or without splinting Source Bekhet AH, Ragab B, Abushouk AI, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2017.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 6 included studies Evidence: low; direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Wrist/carpal tunnel region Device: LLLT used with splinting Source Cheung WKW, Wu IXY, Sit RWS, et al. Physiotherapy. 2020.
Evidence: low Direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 34 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Dental protocol-specific / Many studies followed patients for up to 6 months Area: Sensitive teeth/dentin surfaces Device: Dental laser therapy Source Pion LA, Matos LLM, Gimenez T, et al. Dental and Medical Problems. 2023.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 35 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Dental protocol-specific / Immediate, interim, and persistent follow-up windows Area: Sensitive teeth/dentin surfaces Device: Dental low-level light therapy Source Shan Z, Ji J, McGrath C, et al. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Dermatology / skin health
Study facts systematic-review Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across dermatology trials / Varied across dermatology trials Area: Skin Device: LED dermatology devices Source Jagdeo J, Austin E, Mamalis A, Wong C, Ho D, Siegel DM. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2018.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Wound healing / diabetic foot ulcers
Study facts meta-analysis 7 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by clinical trial / Varied by wound course Area: Diabetic foot ulcers Device: Clinical low-level light therapy Source Li S, Wang C, Wang B, et al. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2018.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Wound healing / diabetic foot ulcers
Study facts meta-analysis 7 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 600, 800 nm Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Diabetic foot ulcers Device: Photobiomodulation devices Source Dos Santos Mendes-Costa L, de Lima VG, Barbosa MPR, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2021.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Wound healing / diabetic foot ulcers
Study facts systematic-review 13 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Diabetic foot ulcers Device: Clinical PBM devices Source Dhlamini T, Houreld NN. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2022.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Neuropathy / diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Study facts systematic-review 8 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by study / Varied by study Area: Feet or lower limb targets in diabetic peripheral neuropathy Device: Photobiomodulation therapy devices Source Korada HY, Arora E, Maiya GA, et al. Current Diabetes Reviews. 2023.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 14 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: 660, 950 nm Dose/timing: Varied across DOMS studies / Follow-up commonly 24 to 96 hours after exercise Area: Affected muscles Device: Targeted PBM devices Source Tsou Y, Chang WD, Chang NJ. Healthcare. 2025.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 15 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across included modalities and PBM trials / Pain outcomes commonly assessed 24 to 96 hours after DOMS induction Area: Affected muscles Device: PBM and other physical therapy modalities Source Chen, et al. 2025.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Dry eye / meibomian gland dysfunction
Study facts meta-analysis 12 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Ophthalmology/optometry device-specific / Outcomes assessed at <= 3 months and in sensitivity analysis at >= 6 months Area: Periocular/meibomian gland treatment area Device: Low-level light therapy combined with intense pulsed light Source Chan KE, Lau BSR, Lim BXH, et al. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye. 2025.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Exercise recovery / oxidative stress
Study facts meta-analysis Study count not extracted Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across included exercise studies / Varied across included exercise studies Area: Exercised muscles Device: PBM exercise-recovery devices Source De Marchi T, Ferlito JV, Ferlito MV, Salvador M, Leal-Junior ECP. Antioxidants. 2022.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Exercise performance / dosing
Study facts systematic-review Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Depends on exercise context and device / Depends on exercise context and device Area: Target muscles involved in the exercise task Device: Low-level laser and LED PBM devices Source Leal-Junior ECP, Lopes-Martins RÁB, Bjordal JM. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2019.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Exercise performance / muscle recovery
Study facts meta-analysis 39 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Usually acute pre-exercise or peri-exercise dosing in included trials / Varied by exercise protocol Area: Target muscles Device: Low-level laser, LED, or combined laser/LED devices Source Vanin AA, Verhagen E, Barboza SD, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2018.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Exercise performance / muscle recovery
Study facts meta-analysis 16 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across exercise studies / Varied across exercise studies Area: Target muscles Device: Red/NIR low-level laser or LED phototherapy devices Source Leal-Junior ECP, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2015.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Hair growth / androgenetic alopecia
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 650 nm Dose/timing: Every other day / 17 weeks Area: Scalp Device: Laser diode cap Source Friedman S, Schnoor P. Dermatologic Surgery. 2017.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 9 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Tender points or musculoskeletal targets Device: LLLT; one RCT used combined LLLT/LED phototherapy Source Yeh SW, Hong CH, Shih MC, et al. Pain Physician. 2019.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Hair growth / androgenetic alopecia
Study facts meta-analysis 7 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 650 nm Dose/timing: Varied by device and trial / Typically multiple months Area: Scalp Device: Home-use laser combs, caps, and helmet devices Source Lueangarun S, Visutjindaporn P, Parcharoen Y, et al. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. 2021.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Hair growth / androgenetic alopecia
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Not fully reported Area: Scalp Device: Low-level laser hair-growth device Source Jimenez JJ, Wikramanayake TC, Bergfeld W, et al. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2014.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Hair growth / androgenetic alopecia
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 655 nm Dose/timing: Not fully reported Area: Scalp Device: Visible red laser and LED scalp device Source Lanzafame RJ, Blanche RR, Bodian AB, et al. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2013.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Hair growth / androgenetic alopecia
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 110 participants Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 655 nm Dose/timing: 26 weeks Area: Scalp Device: Handheld laser comb that parts hair to deliver light to scalp Source Leavitt M, Charles G, Heyman E, Michaels D. Clinical Drug Investigation. 2009.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 35 participants Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: 420, 660 nm Dose/timing: 2.5 min / Twice daily / 4 weeks, with follow-up to 12 weeks Area: Acne-affected facial skin Device: Home-use blue and red LED acne device Source Kwon HH, Lee JB, Yoon JY, et al. British Journal of Dermatology. 2013.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: 630, 850 nm Dose/timing: Not fully reported Area: Periocular crow's-feet area Device: Home-used LED and infrared LED facial mask Source Park SH, Park SO, Jung JA. Medicine. 2025.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Home devices / dermatology
Study facts systematic-review Study count not extracted Evidence: indirect; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Device-specific / Device-specific Area: Skin and cosmetic indications Device: Home-use laser, LED, IPL, infrared, and related light devices Source Juhász ML, Levin MK, Marmur ES. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2017.
Evidence: indirect Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts controlled-trial 24 participants Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: 637, 854 nm Dose/timing: Twice weekly / 8 weeks Area: One side of the face Device: Home-use LED facial device Source Ng JNC, Wanitphakdeedecha R, Yan C. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2020.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Home-use PBM safety / protocol
Study facts systematic-review 11 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Often at least three times per week in reviewed home-use studies / Varied across reviewed conditions Area: Condition-specific Device: Home-use PBM devices, often NIR pulsed LED devices Source Gavish L, Houreld NN. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery. 2019.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Knee osteoarthritis / joint pain
Study facts meta-analysis 22 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Knee joint points Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Stausholm MB, Naterstad IF, Joensen J, et al. BMJ Open. 2019.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Knee osteoarthritis / joint pain
Study facts meta-analysis 10 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Knee Device: Photobiomodulation devices, mostly clinical devices Source Oliveira S, Andrade R, Valente C, et al. Physical Therapy. 2024.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 115 participants Evidence: moderate; direction: mixed Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: 160 J/cm2 / Three times weekly / 3 weeks Area: Forearm skin Device: LED red light exposure Source Jagdeo J, et al. Journal of Biophotonics. 2020.
Evidence: moderate Direction: mixed Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 15 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Short-term treatment courses; varied by trial Area: Low back points Device: Low-level laser therapy, including some laser acupuncture approaches Source Glazov G, Yelland M, Emery J, et al. Acupuncture in Medicine. 2016.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 12 included studies Evidence: low; direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Low back Device: PBM including laser and LED devices Source Tomazoni SS, Almeida MO, Bjordal JM, et al. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2020.
Evidence: low Direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Plantar fasciitis / lower extremity tendinopathy
Study facts meta-analysis Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Short- and medium-term follow-up; no long-term data Area: Lower extremity tendon or plantar fascia region Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Naterstad IF, Joensen J, Bjordal JM, et al. BMJ Open. 2022.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Exercise performance / muscle recovery
Study facts meta-analysis 4 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Post-exercise PBM in included comparisons / Varied by study Area: Exercised muscles Device: PBM muscle-recovery devices Source Ferlito JV, Ferlito MV, Leal-Junior ECP, Tomazoni SS, De Marchi T. Lasers in Medical Science. 2022.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 13 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Myofascial neck pain sites Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Tehrani MR, Nazary-Moghadam S, Zeinalzadeh A, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2022.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 16 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Neck pain sites Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Chow RT, Johnson MI, Lopes-Martins RA, et al. The Lancet. 2009.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis Study count not extracted Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Oral medicine protocol-specific / Varied by trial Area: Oral mucosal lesions Device: Low-level laser therapy and photodynamic therapy Source Hoseinpour Jajarm H, Asadi R, Bardideh E, et al. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2018.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Oral mucositis / cancer supportive care
Study facts systematic-review Study count not extracted Evidence: high; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Specific protocols depend on cancer treatment modality / Specific protocols depend on cancer treatment modality Area: Oral cavity Device: Clinical laser or light therapy for oral mucosa Source Zadik Y, Arany PR, Fregnani ER, et al. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2019.
Evidence: high Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 14 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Dental procedure-specific / Short-term orthodontic pain windows Area: Orthodontic dental targets Device: Diode low-level laser therapy Source Ren C, McGrath C, Yang Y. Lasers in Medical Science. 2015.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 20 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Dental procedure-specific / Outcomes commonly assessed at 24 and 72 hours Area: Orthodontic dental targets Device: Dental low-level laser therapy Source Deana NF, Zaror C, Sandoval P, et al. Pain Research and Management. 2017.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Safety / dosing principles
Study facts other Study count not extracted Evidence: indirect; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Parameter-dependent / Parameter-dependent Area: Parameter-dependent Device: PBM devices Source Huang YY, Sharma SK, Carroll J, Hamblin MR. Dose-Response. 2011.
Evidence: indirect Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Safety / cancer supportive care
Study facts systematic-review 27 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Oncology supportive-care protocol-specific / Oncology supportive-care protocol-specific Area: Treatment-toxicity-specific tissues Device: Clinical PBM devices Source de Pauli Paglioni M, et al. Oral Oncology. 2019.
Evidence: moderate Direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Safety / dosing consensus
Study facts systematic-review Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Condition- and protocol-specific / Condition- and protocol-specific Area: Condition-specific Device: Clinical PBM devices Source Maghfour J, et al. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2025.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 137 participants Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: 590, 660 nm Dose/timing: 3.8 J/cm2 / 10 sessions over 4 weeks / 4 weeks Area: Periocular face area Device: LED photobiomodulation Source Mota LR, Duarte IDS, Galache TR, et al. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery. 2023.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 13 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: 5 J/cm2 / Post-surgical dental protocol-specific / Early healing phase Area: Periodontal surgical sites Device: Dental low-level laser therapy Source Zhao H, Hu J, Zhao L. Lasers in Medical Science. 2021.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 7 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Dental-procedure specific / Short-term follow-up at 1-2 months; intermediate follow-up at 3-6 months Area: Periodontal pockets/tissues Device: Dental low-level laser therapy Source Ren C, McGrath C, Jin L, et al. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2017.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Plantar fasciitis / heel pain
Study facts meta-analysis 19 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Short-term and medium-term comparisons Area: Plantar fascia / heel Device: Low-level laser therapy among other physical modalities Source Li X, Zhang L, Gu S, et al. Medicine. 2018.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts controlled-trial Study count not extracted Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: 160 J/cm2 / Three times weekly / 3 weeks, starting 1 week after surgery Area: Post-surgical scars Device: LED red light scar device Source Kurtti A, et al. Journal of Biophotonics. 2021.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 4 included studies Evidence: very-low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 658, 808, 904, 940 nm Dose/timing: Clinical wound protocol-specific / One positive study assessed 1 month of therapy Area: Pressure ulcers Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Machado RS, Viana S, Sbruzzi G. Lasers in Medical Science. 2017.
Evidence: very-low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial Study count not extracted Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Not fully reported Area: Acne-affected skin Device: Red and blue light acne phototherapy devices Source Li J, Li J, Zhang L, et al. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine. 2022.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Sleep quality / athletic recovery
Study facts controlled-trial Study count not extracted Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Daily during a 14-day intervention / 14 days Area: Whole body Device: Red-light irradiation setup Source Zhao J, Tian Y, Nie J, Xu J, Liu D. Journal of Athletic Training. 2012.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Sleep quality / circadian light
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 114 participants Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: 625 nm Dose/timing: 60 min / Single bedtime exposure in study protocol Area: Visual light exposure Device: Red light room/panel exposure Source Pan R, Zhang G, Deng F, Lin W, Pan J. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2023.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts systematic-review 5 included studies Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Short-term trials Area: Joints or other trial-specific application sites Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Brosseau L, Robinson V, Wells G, et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 18 included studies Evidence: low; direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Affected joints or acupuncture/reflexology targets depending on trial Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Lourinho I, Sousa T, Jardim R, et al. PLOS One. 2023.
Evidence: low Direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Exercise performance / running
Study facts meta-analysis Study count not extracted Evidence: low; direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across running trials / Varied across running trials Area: Running muscles Device: PBM devices used in running performance trials Source Nascimento APD, Silva AVD, Casonatto J, Aguiar AF. International Journal of Exercise Science. 2024.
Evidence: low Direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 17 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Shoulder tendon region Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Haslerud S, Magnussen LH, Joensen J, et al. Physiotherapy Research International. 2015.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Dermatology / skin health
Study facts meta-analysis Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across included skin therapy studies / Varied across included skin therapy studies Area: Skin Device: LED skin therapy devices Source Ngoc LTN, Moon JY, Lee YC. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine. 2023.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Safety / skin rejuvenation
Study facts systematic-review Study count not extracted Evidence: moderate; direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Established skin-rejuvenation parameters in reviewed literature / Established skin-rejuvenation parameters in reviewed literature Area: Skin Device: Aesthetic PBM skin-rejuvenation devices Source Glass GE. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2023.
Evidence: moderate Direction: no-clear-effect Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 76 participants Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: 633, 830 nm Dose/timing: Twice weekly / 4 weeks, with 3-month follow-up Area: One side of the face Device: Quasimonochromatic LED phototherapy Source Lee SY, Park KH, Choi JW, et al. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B. 2007.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Study facts controlled-trial 136 participants Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: 611, 650, 570, 850 nm Dose/timing: 9 J/cm2 / Twice weekly / 30 sessions Area: Large-area skin exposure Device: Large-area red and near-infrared light sources Source Wunsch A, Matuschka K. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2014.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Sleep inertia / alertness
Study facts controlled-trial 30 participants Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 628, 631 nm Dose/timing: Not fully reported Area: Eyes/visual system through mask or goggles Device: Red light mask and goggles Source Figueiro MG, Sahin L, Roohan C, Kalsher M, Plitnick B, Rea MS. Nature and Science of Sleep. 2019.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Sleep quality / daytime function
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 30 participants Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: 660, 740, 810, 870 nm Dose/timing: 25 min / Every other night before bed / 3 weeks Area: Neck Device: Wearable red/NIR phototherapy collar Source Kennedy KER, Wills CCA, Holt C, Grandner MA. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2023.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 18 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across included RCTs / Started within 6 months after surgery in included studies Area: Surgical scars Device: Low-level laser and other energy-based scar devices Source Yenyuwadee S, et al. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. 2024.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Tennis elbow / lateral epicondylitis
Study facts meta-analysis 18 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: 632, 904 nm Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Follow-up commonly 3-8 weeks after treatment Area: Lateral elbow tendon insertions Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Bjordal JM, Lopes-Martins RA, Joensen J, et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Soft-tissue injury / contusion recovery
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 46 participants Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: 30 min / Immediately after contusion and daily during follow-up Area: Thigh contusion region Device: Pulsed red and blue light patch Source Wells, et al. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2024.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts randomized-controlled-trial 43 participants Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: 830 nm Dose/timing: Home-based course after surgery / 4 weeks, starting 1 week post-operation Area: Thyroidectomy surgical scar Device: Home-based 830 nm LED phototherapy device Source Kim, et al. Lasers in Medical Science. 2022.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: panel-replicable
Temporomandibular disorder / jaw pain
Study facts meta-analysis 31 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Temporomandibular joint and related pain points Device: Low-level laser therapy Source Xu GZ, Jia J, Jin L, et al. Pain Research and Management. 2018.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Temporomandibular disorder / jaw pain
Study facts meta-analysis 27 included studies Evidence: moderate; direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable Wavelengths: 633, 672, 780, 904, 910, 1100 nm Dose/timing: Varied by trial / Varied by trial Area: Temporomandibular disorder pain sites Device: Low-level laser therapy and TENS comparators Source Ren H, Liu J, Liu Y, et al. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2022.
Evidence: moderate Direction: positive Panel relevance: partially-replicable
Study facts systematic-review 35 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: 630, 635, 810, 1060, 1068 nm Dose/timing: 10 J/cm2 / Varied by population and study / Varied by population and study Area: Scalp / transcranial targets Device: Transcranial photobiomodulation devices Source Lee TL, Ding Z, Chan AS. Ageing Research Reviews. 2023.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts systematic-review Study count not extracted Evidence: very-low; direction: unclear Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Experimental; not settled / Experimental; not settled Area: Transcranial targets Device: Transcranial red/NIR photobiomodulation Source Cassano P, Petrie SR, Hamblin MR, et al. Neurophotonics. 2016.
Evidence: very-low Direction: unclear Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Study facts meta-analysis 9 included studies Evidence: low; direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied by study / Varied by study Area: Transcranial targets Device: Transcranial photobiomodulation devices Source Salehpour F, Majdi A, Pazhuhi M, et al. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery. 2019.
Evidence: low Direction: positive Panel relevance: not-panel-replicable
Whole-body PBM / exercise recovery
Study facts systematic-review Study count not extracted Evidence: low; direction: mixed Panel relevance: panel-replicable Wavelengths: Not reported Dose/timing: Varied across whole-body PBM studies / Varied across whole-body PBM studies Area: Whole body Device: Whole-body photobiomodulation beds, booths, or large-array devices Source Álvarez-Martínez M, Borden G. Lasers in Medical Science. 2025.
Evidence: low Direction: mixed Panel relevance: panel-replicable